Elevated Risk
IP 179.43.143.146 is a high-risk address originating from Switzerland that has been definitively linked to 174 reported hacking incidents, with automated honeypot sensors detecting sustained intrusion attempts over a two-month window spanning February through March 2026. The address carries a threat level of 8/10, reflecting substantial and credibly confirmed malicious activity that warrants immediate defensive action from any organization with exposed network services.
The IP is registered to Private Layer INC operating autonomous system AS51852 within Swiss network infrastructure, and community abuse reports document a concentrated campaign of unauthorized access attempts detected exclusively through automated honeypot sensors. With a confidence score of 72%, the attribution to malicious hacking behavior is well-supported by the volume of independent detections, though the relatively brief reporting window suggests an active and targeted threat campaign rather than background internet noise. The zero activity frequency rating indicates opportunistic rather than continuous probing, which is consistent with automated scanning tools that cycle through target ranges.
Hacking activity in this context encompasses the full spectrum of intrusion tradecraft, including vulnerability scanning, exploitation attempts, and credential-based access probing against exposed services. For a network operator with SSH, RDP, or web-facing applications, such an address represents a direct pathway to system compromise if left unmitigated. The real-world risk manifests as potential account takeover, data exfiltration, or use of breached infrastructure as a pivot point for further attacks against other targets.
Site operators should implement immediate blocking at the firewall or edge device level for this address and related ranges operated by the same provider, while also deploying rate-limiting on authentication endpoints to frustrate automated attack tooling. Enforcing strong multi-factor authentication on all remote access services, maintaining rigorous patch management cycles, and monitoring authentication logs for brute-force patterns will substantially reduce exposure. Employing defensive tools such as fail2ban to dynamically ban repeat offenders provides an additional layer of automated protection against persistent scanning activity.
UA 
RO 
GB 
SE 
MA