Severe Risk
IP 207.46.224.90 is a critical-risk address with a threat level of 10/10 that has been linked to 157 abuse reports in January 2026, predominantly for SSH brute-force attack activity detected by automated honeypot sensors. This Singapore-hosted IP operating through Microsoft's AS8075 network presents an imminent threat to any publicly accessible SSH services and warrants immediate blocking at network perimeters.
The 94% confidence score and activity frequency of 8/10 indicate sustained, deliberate malicious behavior from this address. All 157 reports were recorded within January 2026, suggesting concentrated hostile activity during this period with no observed lull in operations. Twenty distinct automated honeypot sensors flagged the IP engaging in SSH brute-force attempts, accounting for 16 of the 21 categorized threats, with the remaining incidents classified as general hacking intrusion attempts. The volume of reports relative to the short detection window and the consistency of the attack pattern demonstrate high confidence that this address is actively participating in credential-compromise operations at scale.
SSH brute-force attacks systematically attempt to gain unauthorized server access by iterating through username and password combinations until valid credentials are discovered. The concrete real-world risk posed by an IP conducting such attacks at this volume is significant — successful authentication grants attackers a foothold on target systems, enabling data exfiltration, malware deployment, lateral movement through internal networks, or pivot to further attacks. Organizations with exposed SSH services (commonly port 22) face direct risk of compromise if weak, default, or commonly-guessed credentials are in use, regardless of whether the target infrastructure is a development server, cloud instance, or production system.
Site operators should block IP 207.46.224.90 at the firewall or edge router level and audit external-facing SSH services for necessity. Implementing key-based authentication instead of password-based logins, disabling direct root login, and changing the default SSH port can substantially reduce attack surface. Deploying automated abuse-detection tools such as fail2ban to dynamically ban IPs after repeated authentication failures provides an additional protective layer. Finally, reviewing authentication logs regularly for patterns such as high volumes of failed logins or logins from this address can help identify any successful compromise attempts before they lead to further incident escalation.
NL 
AU 
JP 
IE 
HK 
CA 
SE 
RO 
MX