Critical Threat
IP 35.203.210.203 is a critical-risk address associated with sustained hacking activity, drawing 616 abuse reports across an eight-month period from September 2025 through May 2026. This Google Cloud Platform IP, originating from infrastructure in Great Britain, presents a maximum threat level of 10/10, with automated honeypot sensors flagging it repeatedly for intrusion attempts and unauthorized access activity. The report volume and consistent detection pattern indicate persistent scanning and exploitation behavior rather than opportunistic or fleeting compromise attempts.
The detection data reveals a concerning track record: 616 total reports with 20 recent submissions specifically categorized as hacking activity. All reported threat intelligence originates from automated honeypot sensors distributed across the network, suggesting this address has been actively probing vulnerable services at scale. The 71% confidence score reflects a moderate-to-high certainty that the observed behavior is malicious rather than misconfiguration or benign traffic, while the activity frequency rating of 3/10 indicates ongoing but not necessarily continuous engagement with target systems. The AS396982 Autonomous System, operated by Google Cloud Platform, is a common vector for threat actors seeking to abuse cloud infrastructure credibility and geographic diversity.
Hacking activity encompasses a broad spectrum of intrusion methodologies, including vulnerability scanning, brute-force authentication attempts, and exploitation of unpatched services. This IP poses a tangible risk to any exposed service, particularly Secure Shell, remote desktop, and web application interfaces. Attackers leveraging cloud-based infrastructure like this address can rapidly cycle through targets while masking origin and maintaining plausible deniability through legitimate hosting provider reputation. The sustained report volume demonstrates this address has been actively engaged in hostile reconnaissance and compromise attempts over an extended timeframe.
Defensive measures should include immediate blocking or rate-limiting of this IP at the network perimeter, combined with enforced strong authentication on all remote access services. Implementing fail2ban or equivalent host-based intrusion prevention tools can automatically ban repeated offending IPs. Regular patching of internet-facing services and deployment of web application firewalls will reduce the attack surface this address likely attempts to exploit. Continuous monitoring of authentication logs and network traffic patterns will help identify any successful intrusion attempts that may have occurred before blocking measures were applied.
JP 
BE 
TW 
AU 
FI 
RO 
UG 
HK 
FR