Critical Threat
IP 62.164.177.3, a Dutch address operated by Data Campus Limited under ASN AS215929, is a critical-risk asset that warrants immediate defensive action. This IP has earned a perfect threat score of 10 out of 10, accumulated 232 total abuse reports and demonstrated sustained malicious behavior at an intensity level of 8 out of 10. All recent threat reports specifically catalogue hacking activity, with detection confirmed across 20 independent automated honeypot sensors. The volume of hostile traffic, maximum threat severity and near-certain attribution confidence of 94 percent make this one of the most clearly dangerous sources currently active in public threat feeds. Any organization running publicly accessible services should treat this address as a confirmed hostile actor.
The empirical record is unambiguous. The 232 abuse reports all originate from May 2026, a single reporting window that suggests either a concentrated campaign or highly active persistent infrastructure. Detection was not isolated to a single sensor but distributed across 20 separate automated honeypot sensors, indicating that the scanning or attack activity was broad enough to trigger multiple independent detection points simultaneously. The geographic origin in the Netherlands and the ASN assignment to Data Campus Limited provide network context, but the decisive factors are the sheer report volume and the consistent attribution to hacking-type intrusion attempts over a compressed timeframe.
The dominant threat category, Hacking, encompasses a broad spectrum of unauthorized access activities including vulnerability exploitation, credential stuffing and targeted service probing. Each of the 232 reported connections represents a concrete attempt to breach perimeter defences by exploiting misconfigurations, unpatched software or weak authentication. The elevated activity frequency confirms that whatever automated tooling is being used against honeypot sensors is operating continuously, increasing the probability that similarly configured production systems would encounter the same hostile traffic. The risk is not theoretical; it reflects active, ongoing exploitation attempts against internet-facing surfaces.
Defensive operators should treat IP 62.164.177.3 as an address to block at the network perimeter or firewall level. Deploying or configuring tools such as fail2ban to detect and automatically ban repeated connection attempts from this source will reduce log noise and prevent successful exploitation. Authentication hardening measures—including enforcement of strong password policies, implementation of key-based authentication and deployment of multi-factor authentication—substantially reduce the effectiveness of any credential-focused component within the hacking activity. Continuous monitoring of authentication logs for source IPs associated with this address will enable rapid incident response if a genuine compromise attempt occurs.
DE 
GB 
RO 
MX