Medium Threat
Medium risk rating 6/10 for IP 168.194.160.225 based on 1 incidents.
Suspicious behavior markers present. 23% confidence level.
Automated assessment based on aggregated, anonymized threat data
Medium risk rating 6/10 for IP 168.194.160.225 based on 1 incidents.
Suspicious behavior markers present. 23% confidence level.
Brute-force attacks systematically attempt password combinations against authentication systems.
Implement rate limiting, account lockout policies, multi-factor authentication, and fail2ban.
This IP is hosted on a network (ASN 14868) with generally good reputation. The ISP Ligga Telecomunicacoes S.A. maintains standard security practices.
Monitor traffic patterns. Review logs periodically for escalation.
| Date | Categories | Source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brute-Force | Community | 75% |
Analysis of the entire network (ASN) that this IP address belongs to, providing context about the hosting provider and network-wide threat patterns.
This IP address belongs to Ligga Telecomunicacoes S.A. (AS14868), which manages 21 IP addresses in our monitoring system. Out of these, 500 have been reported for suspicious activities, resulting in a network-wide threat level of 3/10.
How this IP compares to others in our threat intelligence database
This IP is more threatening than 46% of all IPs in our database.
Below Average ThreatCompared against 834,037 reported IPs worldwide
Compared against 368 IPs in ASN 14868
Compared against 111,910 IPs in BR
Daily report activity over the last 30 days showing patterns and peaks.
Evolution of threat level over time based on reported categories and frequency.
Distribution of threat categories reported over time.
Activity patterns showing when this IP is most active during the day and week.
Peak activity at 19:00 with 1 reports
758,083 threat incidents tracked globally • Last 24h: 31,322 Logs
+40 more countries
Other IPs associated with this address through network or behavioral similarity
IPs from the same Autonomous System (AS) network provider.
IPs from the same subnet range, likely same network segment.
IPs from the same country with similar threat profiles.
IPs with similar threat level and confidence scores.