Significant Threat
IP 45.238.235.2 identified as significant threat (8/10) from 7 events.
Multiple malicious indicators detected. Confidence level: 40%.
Automated assessment based on aggregated, anonymized threat data
IP 45.238.235.2 identified as significant threat (8/10) from 7 events.
Multiple malicious indicators detected. Confidence level: 40%.
General hacking activity includes various intrusion attempts, exploitation of vulnerabilities, and unauthorized access attempts.
Keep systems patched, implement intrusion detection, and follow security best practices.
Steady malicious activity over 2 days indicates persistent threat actor operations.
This IP is hosted on a network (ASN 268350) with generally good reputation. The ISP R.R.COMUNICACAO & MULTIMIDIA EIRELI maintains standard security practices.
Implement rate limiting or temporary blocking measures.
| Date | Categories | Source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bad Web Bot Web App Attack | Community | 75% | |
| Hacking | Community | 75% | |
| Hacking | Community | 75% | |
| Hacking | Community | 75% | |
| SSH Brute-Force | Community | 75% | |
| Bad Web Bot Web App Attack | Community | 75% | |
| Hacking Web App Attack WP Plugin Exploit +3 | Honeypot x10 | 75% |
How this IP compares to others in our threat intelligence database
This IP is more threatening than 89% of all IPs in our database.
High Threat PercentileCompared against 887,011 reported IPs worldwide
Compared against 4 IPs in ASN 268350
Compared against 116,195 IPs in BR
Daily report activity over the last 30 days showing patterns and peaks.
Evolution of threat level over time based on reported categories and frequency.
Distribution of threat categories reported over time.
Activity patterns showing when this IP is most active during the day and week.
Peak activity at 05:00 with 2 reports
800,006 threat incidents tracked globally • Last 24h: 62,884 Logs
+40 more countries
Other IPs associated with this address through network or behavioral similarity
IPs from the same Autonomous System (AS) network provider.
IPs from the same subnet range, likely same network segment.
IPs from the same country with similar threat profiles.
IPs with similar threat level and confidence scores.